Marketing Mix Modeling, Media Mix Modeling, Marketing Effectiveness, Experimentation, Causal Inference, Adstock, Marketing ROI, Statistics, Machine Learning, Marketing Attribution, Media Planning, Marketing Budget Optimization, Robyn, Multi touch Attribution, First Party Data, Privacy Proof Marketing Solutions.
Why you shouldn't use media ROI benchmarks to set the priors.

Why you shouldn’t use media ROI benchmarks to set the priors

Why you shouldn't use media ROI benchmarks to set the priors.
Why you shouldn’t use media ROI benchmarks to set the priors.

We are currently in talks with a company to replace their existing MMM vendor. The company realized that the estimates given by this vendor was consistently inaccurate.

We dug deeper and the usual suspects turned up.

1) The vendor was using Bayesian MMM (big big red flag).

Ok, since I have already talked so much about why Bayesian MMM is not good.
I will be prudent with my keystrokes and instead point you to my previous posts on this topic (link in resources).

2) The second most startling thing the vendor was doing (and topic of my post today) is – setting priors based on ROI benchmarks !!

🖌 Don’t paint everyone with the same brush

As the saying goes, one should also not paint all the brands with the same ROI numbers.

Why?

Even within the same domain, let’s say E-commerce, the ROI benchmark for a platform does not remain static.

Further, more than the ROI of the platform, the ROI is also a function of the creatives.

Because there is always a variance in how each brand designs their creatives/campaigns, the same ROI number is not applicable to them.

If you specify the model with benchmark ROIs, more often than not you will get wrong estimates.

ROI benchmarks at best could be a guide post model fitting but should not be used to specify the model in first place.

The above is one more reason why we prefer Frequentist MMM where one does not have much room to bias the model from the get go.

We are confident that with this client, we will be able to get better accurate estimates with our methods.

Resources:

Which technique provides for great manipulation in MMM – Bayesian or Frequentist?
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/venkat-raman-analytics_marketingmixmodeling-statistics-marketingattribution-activity-7156533790130003968-qVTr?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop

Want performance guarantees ? choose Frequentist MMM.
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/venkat-raman-analytics_marketingmixmodeling-statistics-marketingattribution-activity-7151460386980945920-H-4U?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop

Adopting MMM for the first time ? Use Frequentist MMM.
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/venkat-raman-analytics_marketingmixmodeling-marketingattribution-activity-7148928932862472192-ozrW?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop

Bayesian MMM is not a silver bullet for MMM’s Multicollinearity issue
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/venkat-raman-analytics_marketingmixmodeling-marketingattribution-activity-7106973443807444992-H5Bq?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop

The Richard McElreath’s Quartet and problem with priors
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/venkat-raman-analytics_marketingmixmodeling-marketingattribution-activity-7107946791983071232-w07F?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recommended Posts

Chebyshev’s Inequality for Marketing Mix Model Diagnostics

Chebyshev’s Inequality for Marketing…

At Aryma Labs, we constantly endeavor to add as much science as possible…

How to use Robyn’s…

In my last post (ICYMI link in resources), I talked about the similarities…

Similarities between Decomp RSSD and Bayesian Priors in Marketing Mix Modeling (MMM)

Similarities between Decomp RSSD…

Open source Marketing Mix Modeling (MMM) tools are great for democratizing MMM. But…

Scroll to Top