Marketing Mix Modeling, Media Mix Modeling, Marketing Effectiveness, Experimentation, Causal Inference, Adstock, Marketing ROI, Statistics, Machine Learning, Marketing Attribution, Media Planning, Marketing Budget Optimization, Robyn, Multi touch Attribution, First Party Data, Privacy Proof Marketing Solutions.

Explaining the ‘Hourglass’ shape of Confidence Interval

Couple of weeks back I wrote a post on “Why we report both confidence Interval and Prediction Interval in our MMM models.”

If one were to notice the shape of the confidence Interval, one would notice that it is in the shape of ‘hourglass’ or ‘sand clock’.

Now why is that?

Well, the answer again boils down to what Regression does and what Confidence Interval calculates.

💡In Linear Regression, we we don’t model the raw response, rather we model the conditional mean (expected value) -> E(Y|X).

💡In Linear Regression, the line or plane passes through (x̄,y̅)

💡Secondly, in confidence Interval we try to see whether the conditional mean (the parameter) is present in the interval or not.

We basically answer the question of “If we were to do this Linear Regression again and again (in a way redrawing samples from the population), then does the CI constructed each time contain the true parameter or not”? If in 95% of the cases, we do end up having the true parameter, then we are set to have 95% CI.”

Now that we have the two pieces of information that a regression line or plane passes through (x̄, y̅)
and that CI is an interval to see the presence of the parameter.

It becomes clear to us that the point (x̄, y̅) kind of acts like a fulcrum.

Talking about fulcrum, one might find it relatable that ‘moments’ in statistics has a physics origin !! It must be noted that ‘Mean’ is the first raw moment.

Now with the analogy that (x̄, y̅) acting like a fulcrum, you can imagine this regression line to be like a see-saw. If the fulcrum is at the Centre, one can easily see that the movement at the Centre is limited and while at the ends the movement is more pronounced.

Now with all these reasons, I hope one can see why the confidence interval has an hour glass shape.

Resources:

Why we report both confidence Interval and Prediction Interval in our MMM models – https://www.linkedin.com/posts/venkat-raman-analytics_linearregression-statistics-datascience-activity-7112420792360996864-ZOMM?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop

Moments and physics connection – https://www.linkedin.com/posts/venkat-raman-analytics_statistics-datascience-machinelearning-activity-7087298528087060480-aZkS?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop

Shape of Confidence Interval Stack exchange answer – https://stats.stackexchange.com/a/85565

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Recommended Posts

Chebyshev’s Inequality for Marketing Mix Model Diagnostics

Chebyshev’s Inequality for Marketing…

At Aryma Labs, we constantly endeavor to add as much science as possible…

How to use Robyn’s…

In my last post (ICYMI link in resources), I talked about the similarities…

Similarities between Decomp RSSD and Bayesian Priors in Marketing Mix Modeling (MMM)

Similarities between Decomp RSSD…

Open source Marketing Mix Modeling (MMM) tools are great for democratizing MMM. But…

Scroll to Top